Thursday 21 June 2012

Appealing a claim- Will a standard format work to improve your practice’s medical billing?

The procedure of appealing an insurance claim is intricate, although it can be successful if completed properly because there are many grounds for claims to be denied by an insurance company or a payer. The payer collects a lot of claims on a daily basis and the claim can be easily denied if there has been a mistake in analysis or medical billing and coding errors including many others. Furthermore, there is also a requirement to understand if the claim is of importance because a claim of a very small amount need not be appealed and can be written off but one which is worth a considerable sum needs to be scrutinized. However the physician’s office in this case may need to apply various measures considered the following challenges.

In Denial

The fact that a physician or practice receives the accurate amount of reimbursement even when the claim is not denied is a wrong assumption. Insurance companies may con a physician out of his or her fair share of reimbursements in many ways that are very difficult to detect and need a dedicated and keen professional to find the lacunae in the proper reimbursement of physicians since almost 19% of claims denied are due to errors of the insurance companies. This especially holds true in the case of private insurers due to errors made by the insurance companies in claims and detecting these errors requires skill and sustained effort. As a result some physicians and practices are reluctant to appeal denied or underpaid claims since this may increase the administrative work and expenses. However, nothing can be further from the truth when considering the long term repercussions of the monetary benefits that can be enjoyed even with 5-10% increase in revenue which can be a considerable amount.

The Impact of Reforms

In the face of reforms, revenues are set to increase dramatically along with administrative and billing process as 31 million uninsured Americans receive insurance. Appealing a denied claim is becoming voluminous but the new billing and coding procedures are aimed at making this process of reimbursement or appealing much smoother with the transition from ICD-9 codes to ICD-10 codes and adoption of the 5010 platform and emphasis on quality care and patient privacy through HIPAA compliance. The importance of time and money cannot be overemphasized and denied claims, especially for private insurance companies, have to be appealed within a stipulated period of time after the claim is denied. Therefore preventive steps to save time such as error reduction through analysis and a scientific approach in Revenue Cycle Management (RCM)  is required in order to sustain the low rate of denial over longer periods of time.

Vital Signs

Analyzing the pattern in which claims are denied by an insurance companies and finding out the most common false denials is a crucial part of the process of appealing denied claims. Denied claims can fall in various categories such as:
  • Errors in documentation
  • Services not covered
  • Mistakes in medical billing and coding
  • Technical difficulties involving Electronic Health Records (EHRs)
  • Not considered “medically necessary” by the payer
Arguing your case becomes more difficult due to the huge amount of laws, rules, and regulations that seem to drown the actual cause of the denial. Thus customization of claims becomes much easier when they can be categorized and scientifically solved within a given period of time.

Scientific approach

In this scenario appealing a claim may require more than a standard format and physicians short of time can benefit by acquiring services of a medical billing service. Medical billing and coding experts at Medicalbillersandcoders.com not just perform basic coding and billing functions but are also backed by a team of research professionals who ensure efficient RCM, productive payer interaction, and a scientific approach towards collections with the “bucket” approach in Accounts Receivables (AR) and prompt reimbursements for physicians and practices all over the country with complete HIPAA compliance.

‘Pay-as-you-go’ as a value-based medical billing service model

While we are not alien to the term ‘pay-as-you-go’, it is something that is catching the imagination of physicians opting for outsourced medical billing services. Unlike in the past, when ‘pay-as-you-go’ was sporadically availed by a few physicians, it is now emerging as a viable alternative to long-term contractual medical billing services. Well… what is this ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model after all and what makes it so affable to physicians opting for outsourced medical billing services? Much true to its name, ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model’ is a niche medical billing service wherein physicians are obliged to pay their service provider (usually a percentage of the eventual reimbursement) only when they approach for getting their bills reimbursed. Usually, a percentage is worked out prior to soliciting ‘pay-as-you-go’ medical billing services from prospective medical billing companies. The reason why the present-day generation physicians deem ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model’ appropriate is primarily because of their restrictive financial ability as well as being able to transact on value-based system.

The surge in the demand for ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model’ has its roots in a combination of factors – spiraling cost of contractual billing services, continuous fall in reimbursement rates, rapid increase in stand-alone or small physician practices, and less incidence of insurance-backed medical services, popularly known as cash-based services. The thought of countering this adverse impact on physicians’ revenues through in-house medical billing seems to have lost its significance amidst the monumental cost associated with switch over to mandatory EHR, and the ensuing ICD-10 & HIPAA 5010 compliant clinical and operational mandate. While physicians are convinced of the efficacy of ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model’ in countering their sagging revenue fortunes, service providers need to be equally responsive to such demand from physicians. Notwithstanding it being an additional service portfolio in the medical billing companies’ service offering, many medical billing companies are apprehensive of the future of the contractual model. But, their reasoning may not be true.

The main reason why they may not be true in assuming ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model to be detrimental to the future of the contractual model is the fact that large hospitals, clinics, multispecialty groups, and more importantly the ACOs will continue to drive the demand for contractual model of medical billing services.  Therefore, ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model will not come in the way of their main service portfolio, but will only evolve to be an additional revenue source. In view of such scope for additional portfolio of service, medical billing services would do well to strategically expand their ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model to the areas where challenges faced in medical billing are rampant. On the whole, it puts both physicians as well as service provides in a win-win position.

While most of the medical billing companies are still analyzing the pros and cons of ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model, Medicalbillersandcoders.com (www.medicalbillersandcoders.com) – by virtue of being the largest consortium of medical billers and coders across the U.S – has already begun to reach to the physician practices in need of ‘pay-as-you-go’ service model. The strategic spread of its diverse medical billers and coders across the regions dominated by stand-alone practitioners makes it easily accessible and affordable.

Thursday 14 June 2012

HIPAA 5010 enforcement delayed to ensure doctors & entities complete transition

Enforcement of HIPAA 5010 transactions on March 15, 2012, was delayed for the second time for another 3 months by the government, with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Office of E-Health Standards and Services (OESS) pushing the date further to June 30, 2012, in order to not compromise physician cash flow. Physicians have previously communicated to AMA significant cash flow problems they encountered associated with the transition to HIPAA Version 5010. Essentially the rule called for compliance by January 1, 2012, however earlier on November 17, 2011 OESS announced its first enforcement delay of three months, referring to the move as “enforcement discretion”.

OESS states that there are still various outstanding issues and challenges hampering full implementation, hence the delay. To make sure that all entities complete the transition OESS considers that these remaining issues necessitate an extension of enforcement discretion, anticipating transition statistics to reach 98% industry wide by the end of the enforcement discretion period.

Progress on HIPAA 5010 enforcement by varied healthcare entities

According to OESS Health plans, clearinghouses, providers and software vendors have been making steady progress towards enforcement:

  • The Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) program is currently reporting successful receipt and processing of over 70 percent of all Part A claims and over 90 percent of all Part B claims in the Version 5010 format
  • Commercial plans are reporting similar numbers
  • State Medicaid agencies are showing progress as well, and some have made a full transition to Version 5010

What can Doctors do now to prepare for HIPAA 5010?

Reaching almost midway to the second enforcement delay date, along with the need to convert to ICD-10 soon after complying with 5010, it becomes imperative for doctors who haven’t as yet to begin their transition work as early as possible.

The major apprehension for practices is to complete implementation and full functionality at or before the deadline to avoid transaction rejections and subsequent payment delays. Practices will need to develop an implementation plan:
  • Updating software to work under the new standards and contact software vendors, claims clearinghouses or billing service and health insurance payers to verify that they are operating as per 5010 standards
  • Identify changes to data reporting requirements, changes to existing practice work flow, business processes and staff training needs
  • Test with your trading partners- like payers/clearinghouses and budget for implementation costs – including expenses for system changes, resource materials, consultants and training
In this crucial time of healthcare reforms and increased stress on value for service, physicians short of time find it practical to partner with experts who can handle their entire revenue cycle, in order to concentrate more on streamlining their process and enhance patient care.

Medicalbillersandcoders.com expert consultancy providing medical billing and coding services is also offering software advice and support to US healthcare providers with their RCM and has been assisting physicians with HIPAA 5010 implementation. MBC offers professional support and assistance to healthcare providers to keep abreast to the changing industry norms, so that they can concentrate on their core service of patient care.

How are States retaining physicians in times of shortage?

Physician shortages is a growing concern and is pushing various states to keep doctors trained in medical schools and residency programs from crossing state lines to practice medicine. According to new statistics from the Assn. of American Medical Colleges- nationwide, there were 258.7 active physicians per 100,000 people and in individual states, ratios range from a high of 415.5 physicians per 100,000 people in Massachusetts to a low of 176.4 per 100,000 in Mississippi.

In this scenario medical school, hospitals, medical societies and state legislatures are increasingly taking a practical approach to retain the physicians and doctors-in-training in their state. According to a report by AAMC Center for Workforce Studies on average:

39% of U.S. physicians practice  State where they went to medical school
48% of U.S. physicians practice  State where they completed graduate medical education

Methods adopted by states to retain physicians

AAMC projections depict that physician shortages nationwide are projected to reach 62,900 doctors by 2015 and 91,500 by 2020 and several states to retain physicians have:
  • Opened new medical schools or expanded existing ones
  • Are offering incentives such as bonuses, scholarships or loan repayment programs to physicians
  • Communities are developing new residency programs with the aim that physicians will develop long-term professional and personal relationships during GME training and keep them from moving out
  • Certain schools’ mission is to train physicians from their states to practice in their states. However states need enough GME training positions else this efforts are wasted as then physicians will shift to another state
Iowa is below national average retaining 22% of its medical school graduates and 37% of physicians who complete GME training in the state and several efforts in Iowa have been designed to attract physicians to stay in the state. Several other states including Kansas, Mississippi and Alabama offer loan repayment programs for doctors to practice locally.

In Oklahoma, the state offers scholarships and loans to medical students and residents who agree to practice in rural Oklahoma for a set amount of time. Hence Oklahoma is above national averages, retaining 48% of its medical school graduates and 52% of physicians who complete residency training.

Physician adapting to this shortage

Higher revenues and incentives would attract more physicians to the profession and also keep doctors from moving out from states. Healthcare reforms are striving to improve quality of care and physician incentives, to entice more doctors to stay in the profession; but this leaves doctors with little time to balance both patient care and Revenue Cycle Management. As physicians move towards a value based system of healthcare delivery, they would be well-off by partnering with experienced Medical Billing Companies which can offer a balanced approach for both operational as well as revenue maximization.

Medicalbillersandcoders.com experienced in offering cost-optimizing and revenue-maximizing Medical Billing Revenue Cycle Management in tandem with their goal to assist healthcare should be able to play an essential role in making physicians’ transition towards a value based model easier and profitable, hence also helping towards eliminating physician shortage in the long term.